MESSAGE
| DATE | 2003-02-10 |
| FROM | Richard Stallman
|
| SUBJECT | Re: [hangout] Re: eGovOS conference in D.C.; I'm not attending that
|
From owner-hangout-desteny-at-mrbrklyn.com Mon Feb 10 13:22:11 2003
Received: from www2.mrbrklyn.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mrbrklyn.com (8.12.3/8.11.2/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) with ESMTP id h1AIMBso002800
for ; Mon, 10 Feb 2003 13:22:11 -0500
Received: (from mdom-at-localhost)
by www2.mrbrklyn.com (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id h1AIMBLJ002799
for hangout-desteny; Mon, 10 Feb 2003 13:22:11 -0500
X-Authentication-Warning: www2.mrbrklyn.com: mdom set sender to owner-hangout-at-www2.mrbrklyn.com using -f
Received: from www2.mrbrklyn.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mrbrklyn.com (8.12.3/8.11.2/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) with ESMTP id h1AIMAso002793
for ; Mon, 10 Feb 2003 13:22:10 -0500
Received: (from ruben-at-localhost)
by www2.mrbrklyn.com (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id h1AIMAsW002792
for hangout-at-www2.mrbrklyn.com; Mon, 10 Feb 2003 13:22:10 -0500
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (fencepost.gnu.org [199.232.76.164])
by mrbrklyn.com (8.12.3/8.11.2/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) with ESMTP id h1AAVYXH024949;
Mon, 10 Feb 2003 05:31:34 -0500
Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.10)
id 18iBFx-0004RV-00; Mon, 10 Feb 2003 05:33:45 -0500
From: Richard Stallman
To: David Sugar
CC: jays-at-panix.com, ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com, derek-at-gnue.org, gnue-at-gnu.org,
hangout-at-nylxs.com, bkuhn-at-gnu.org, jays-at-panix.com
In-reply-to: <200302071900.08059.dyfet-at-ostel.com> (message from David Sugar on
Fri, 7 Feb 2003 19:00:07 -0500)
Subject: Re: [hangout] Re: eGovOS conference in D.C.; I'm not attending that
References: <200302061635.20758.dyfet-at-ostel.com> <200302071900.08059.dyfet-at-ostel.com>
Message-Id:
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 05:33:45 -0500
Sender: owner-hangout-at-mrbrklyn.com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Richard Stallman
List: New Yorkers Linux Scene
Admin: To unsubscribe send unsubscribename-at-domian.com to hangout-request-at-www2.mrbrklyn.com
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 7777
Status: RO
Content-Length: 1511
Lines: 32
Also, I do consider it possible that some of the other organizers
of this event simply made a bad choice in judgement or were misled without
being fully aware of what they were doing, the implications of their action,
or the ways that thier event is being misused as a result.
I think the organizers know exactly what they are doing. When Tony
Stanco started down this path, he told me that he was bowing to
pressure from the sponsors, pressure to hush up the free software
movement and its ethical aspects. They themselves had come under
pressure. I told him in no uncertain terms that he should not let
them redirect his efforts in the wrong direction.
I do know that if we create an immediate and public
confrontation it would become far harder for them to choose to
alter their current plans if some of them would have been open to
doing so, and would also immediately limit our choice of options
to a single and fixed course of action.
I spoke to him about this at length last summer. I see no hope of
convincing him, because he says that his bosses reject any
improvement.
I suppose we could try finding out who they are and talking with them
privately. Would someone like to do this now? I'd be willing to talk
with them if someone finds out who. I will be in DC at the end of
this month, so maybe I could meet them in person.
____________________________
New Yorker Free Software Users Scene
Fair Use -
because it's either fair use or useless....
|
|
