MESSAGE
| DATE | 2015-03-18 |
| FROM | Rick Moen
|
| SUBJECT | Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] Apple crimes
|
From owner-hangout-outgoing-at-mrbrklyn.com Wed Mar 18 01:25:38 2015
Return-Path:
X-Original-To: archive-at-mrbrklyn.com
Delivered-To: archive-at-mrbrklyn.com
Received: by mrbrklyn.com (Postfix)
id B31D2161310; Wed, 18 Mar 2015 01:25:37 -0400 (EDT)
Delivered-To: hangout-outgoing-at-mrbrklyn.com
Received: by mrbrklyn.com (Postfix, from userid 28)
id A66FA161312; Wed, 18 Mar 2015 01:25:37 -0400 (EDT)
Delivered-To: hangout-at-nylxs.com
Received: from linuxmafia.com (linuxmafia.COM [198.144.195.186])
by mrbrklyn.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93D57161310
for ; Wed, 18 Mar 2015 01:25:13 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from rick by linuxmafia.com with local (Exim 4.72)
(envelope-from )
id 1YY6Tg-0006RK-9G
for hangout-at-nylxs.com; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 22:25:12 -0700
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 22:25:12 -0700
From: Rick Moen
To: hangout-at-nylxs.com
Subject: Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] Apple crimes
Message-ID: <20150318052512.GB15420-at-linuxmafia.com>
References: <5501FC22.5040509-at-panix.com>
<20150317114202.GS23366-at-linuxmafia.com>
<55083496.40405-at-panix.com>
<20150317195833.GZ23366-at-linuxmafia.com>
<55088949.4030705-at-panix.com>
<20150317203635.6004885.15124.4917-at-gmail.com>
<20150317204944.GC23366-at-linuxmafia.com>
<20150317221129.GA15420-at-linuxmafia.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20150317221129.GA15420-at-linuxmafia.com>
Organization: If you lived here, you'd be $HOME already.
X-Mas: Bah humbug.
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP:
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: rick-at-linuxmafia.com
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on linuxmafia.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Sender: owner-hangout-at-mrbrklyn.com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: hangout-at-nylxs.com
[NYLXS: HANGOUT]
X-BeenThere: hangout-at-nylxs.com
X-Mailing-list: hangout-at-nylxs.com
Precedence: list
List-Id: NYLXS General Discussion Forum
List-Unsubscribe:
List-Archive:
List-Post:
List-Help:
List-Subscribe:
Adding to that:
> The latter mishap became an issue in the judge's preliminary opinion in
> the AT&T v. Regents of the University California case over BSD Unix:
> The judge observed in passing that AT&T had failed to include copyright
> notices on some distributed copies of (if memory serves) Version 7 Unix,
> hence the entire basis for their lawsuit against UC Berkeley and BSDi
> was in grave doubt.
Preliminary ruling readable as 'USL v. BSD and UC Regents' on
http://linuxmafia.com/kb/Licensing_and_Law .
And, fellahs, those of you who haven't studied software law probably
should avoid making pronouncements on it.
|
|
