|FROM ||Rick Moen
|SUBJECT ||Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] Apple crimes
|From owner-hangout-outgoing-at-mrbrklyn.com Wed Mar 18 01:25:38 2015
Received: by mrbrklyn.com (Postfix)
id B31D2161310; Wed, 18 Mar 2015 01:25:37 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by mrbrklyn.com (Postfix, from userid 28)
id A66FA161312; Wed, 18 Mar 2015 01:25:37 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from linuxmafia.com (linuxmafia.COM [18.104.22.168])
by mrbrklyn.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93D57161310
for ; Wed, 18 Mar 2015 01:25:13 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from rick by linuxmafia.com with local (Exim 4.72)
for hangout-at-nylxs.com; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 22:25:12 -0700
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 22:25:12 -0700
From: Rick Moen
Subject: Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] Apple crimes
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Organization: If you lived here, you'd be $HOME already.
X-Mas: Bah humbug.
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on linuxmafia.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
List-Id: NYLXS General Discussion Forum
Adding to that:
> The latter mishap became an issue in the judge's preliminary opinion in
> the AT&T v. Regents of the University California case over BSD Unix:
> The judge observed in passing that AT&T had failed to include copyright
> notices on some distributed copies of (if memory serves) Version 7 Unix,
> hence the entire basis for their lawsuit against UC Berkeley and BSDi
> was in grave doubt.
Preliminary ruling readable as 'USL v. BSD and UC Regents' on
And, fellahs, those of you who haven't studied software law probably
should avoid making pronouncements on it.