MESSAGE
DATE | 2015-03-18 |
FROM | Rick Moen
|
SUBJECT | Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] Apple crimes
|
From owner-hangout-outgoing-at-mrbrklyn.com Wed Mar 18 01:25:38 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-at-mrbrklyn.com Delivered-To: archive-at-mrbrklyn.com Received: by mrbrklyn.com (Postfix) id B31D2161310; Wed, 18 Mar 2015 01:25:37 -0400 (EDT) Delivered-To: hangout-outgoing-at-mrbrklyn.com Received: by mrbrklyn.com (Postfix, from userid 28) id A66FA161312; Wed, 18 Mar 2015 01:25:37 -0400 (EDT) Delivered-To: hangout-at-nylxs.com Received: from linuxmafia.com (linuxmafia.COM [198.144.195.186]) by mrbrklyn.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93D57161310 for ; Wed, 18 Mar 2015 01:25:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rick by linuxmafia.com with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1YY6Tg-0006RK-9G for hangout-at-nylxs.com; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 22:25:12 -0700 Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 22:25:12 -0700 From: Rick Moen To: hangout-at-nylxs.com Subject: Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] Apple crimes Message-ID: <20150318052512.GB15420-at-linuxmafia.com> References: <5501FC22.5040509-at-panix.com> <20150317114202.GS23366-at-linuxmafia.com> <55083496.40405-at-panix.com> <20150317195833.GZ23366-at-linuxmafia.com> <55088949.4030705-at-panix.com> <20150317203635.6004885.15124.4917-at-gmail.com> <20150317204944.GC23366-at-linuxmafia.com> <20150317221129.GA15420-at-linuxmafia.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150317221129.GA15420-at-linuxmafia.com> Organization: If you lived here, you'd be $HOME already. X-Mas: Bah humbug. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: rick-at-linuxmafia.com X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on linuxmafia.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: owner-hangout-at-mrbrklyn.com Precedence: bulk Reply-To: hangout-at-nylxs.com [NYLXS: HANGOUT] X-BeenThere: hangout-at-nylxs.com X-Mailing-list: hangout-at-nylxs.com Precedence: list List-Id: NYLXS General Discussion Forum List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe:
Adding to that:
> The latter mishap became an issue in the judge's preliminary opinion in > the AT&T v. Regents of the University California case over BSD Unix: > The judge observed in passing that AT&T had failed to include copyright > notices on some distributed copies of (if memory serves) Version 7 Unix, > hence the entire basis for their lawsuit against UC Berkeley and BSDi > was in grave doubt.
Preliminary ruling readable as 'USL v. BSD and UC Regents' on http://linuxmafia.com/kb/Licensing_and_Law .
And, fellahs, those of you who haven't studied software law probably should avoid making pronouncements on it.
|
|