MESSAGE
| DATE | 2015-03-18 |
| FROM | Rick Moen
|
| SUBJECT | Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] Apple crimes
|
From owner-hangout-outgoing-at-mrbrklyn.com Wed Mar 18 01:38:06 2015
Return-Path:
X-Original-To: archive-at-mrbrklyn.com
Delivered-To: archive-at-mrbrklyn.com
Received: by mrbrklyn.com (Postfix)
id 60F67161311; Wed, 18 Mar 2015 01:38:06 -0400 (EDT)
Delivered-To: hangout-outgoing-at-mrbrklyn.com
Received: by mrbrklyn.com (Postfix, from userid 28)
id 516CF161313; Wed, 18 Mar 2015 01:38:06 -0400 (EDT)
Delivered-To: hangout-at-nylxs.com
Received: from linuxmafia.com (linuxmafia.COM [198.144.195.186])
by mrbrklyn.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E7F0161311
for ; Wed, 18 Mar 2015 01:37:41 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from rick by linuxmafia.com with local (Exim 4.72)
(envelope-from )
id 1YY6fl-0006Wm-61
for hangout-at-nylxs.com; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 22:37:41 -0700
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 22:37:41 -0700
From: Rick Moen
To: hangout-at-nylxs.com
Subject: Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] Apple crimes
Message-ID: <20150318053741.GF23366-at-linuxmafia.com>
References: <5501FC22.5040509-at-panix.com>
<20150317114202.GS23366-at-linuxmafia.com>
<55083496.40405-at-panix.com>
<20150317195833.GZ23366-at-linuxmafia.com>
<55088949.4030705-at-panix.com>
<20150317203635.6004885.15124.4917-at-gmail.com>
<20150317204944.GC23366-at-linuxmafia.com>
<20150317221129.GA15420-at-linuxmafia.com>
<20150318013339.6004885.25631.4936-at-gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <20150318013339.6004885.25631.4936-at-gmail.com>
Organization: If you lived here, you'd be $HOME already.
X-Mas: Bah humbug.
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP:
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: rick-at-linuxmafia.com
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on linuxmafia.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Sender: owner-hangout-at-mrbrklyn.com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: hangout-at-nylxs.com
[NYLXS: HANGOUT]
X-BeenThere: hangout-at-nylxs.com
X-Mailing-list: hangout-at-nylxs.com
Precedence: list
List-Id: NYLXS General Discussion Forum
List-Unsubscribe:
List-Archive:
List-Post:
List-Help:
List-Subscribe:
Quoting prmarino1-at-gmail.com (prmarino1-at-gmail.com):
> We were essentially saying the same thing I just dumbed it down.?
> Essentially once it is included in the upstream project with any
> additional modifications it becomes a new whole piece of software.
But with more owners. (Technically, no, it is not a 'whole new piece of
software'. In legal terms, it is a derivative work. Which please see.)
> So in a sense both now hold an individual copyright on the code;
> however you are quite wrong on the assertion that people don't give
> away the rights to their code.
Cite controlling law, please. I did. You, by contrast, are merely
asserting I (and the Copyright Act, which I cited) are mistaken without
stating any reason, let alone the damned impressive one required to
overrule primary Federal statute law. Kindly state your legal authority.
> In fact it happens all the time with open source software due to
> submission agreements most people don't read.
Example, please?
|
|
