This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--===============1839997284==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="nextPart3026602.0u3x58NJM7"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--nextPart3026602.0u3x58NJM7
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Le mardi 5 novembre 2019, 22:17:07 CET Brandon Invergo a =C3=A9crit :
> We do have a problem with someone under moderation who is sending
> messages off-list. It probably would have happened eventually anyway,
> no matter who was moderating. Anyway, I do not know how to moderate
> that. If you have suggestions on how to handle it, I'm all ears.
Suing senders of possible harassment would be the /de facto/ social solutio=
n on a legal=20
ground.
Make mailing-list software censor the mail address of *anybody* communicati=
ng through=20
the mailing list would prevent such thing to happen to more people in the f=
uture (this=20
could be advertised as a =E2=80=9Canti-harassment feature=E2=80=9D). Some =
=E2=80=9Cuser-friendly=E2=80=9D high-level and=20
poorly made software already do this by default (so to avoid DKIM issues).
Then the list would force itself as centralized unavoidable intermediary fo=
r all=20
communication between third parties, unless active countermeasures (address=
books or=20
search engines) are used.
I strongly oppose this solution. It consist in centralization and authorit=
arism, as well as=20
breaking mail even more.
--nextPart3026602.0u3x58NJM7
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
html40/strict.dtd">
t-weight:400; font-style:normal;">
ht:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; -qt-user-state:0;">Le mardi 5 =
novembre 2019, 22:17:07 CET Brandon Invergo a =C3=A9crit=C2=A0:
ht:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; -qt-user-state:0;">> We do =
have a problem with someone under moderation who is sending
ht:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; -qt-user-state:0;">> messag=
es off-list. It probably would have happened eventually anyway,
ht:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; -qt-user-state:0;">> no mat=
ter who was moderating. Anyway, I do not know how to moderate
ht:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; -qt-user-state:0;">> that. =
If you have suggestions on how to handle it, I'm all ears.
rgin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; ">&nb=
sp;
ht:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; -qt-user-state:0;">Suing sende=
rs of possible harassment would be the =
de facto social solution on a legal ground.
rgin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; ">&nb=
sp;
ht:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; -qt-user-state:0;">Make mailin=
g-list software censor the mail address of *anybody* communicating through =
the mailing list would prevent such thing to happen to more people in the f=
uture (this could be advertised as a =E2=80=9Canti-harassment feature=E2=80=
=9D). Some =E2=80=9Cuser-friendly=E2=80=9D high-level and poorly made soft=
ware already do this by default (so to avoid DKIM issues).
rgin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; ">&nb=
sp;
ht:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; -qt-user-state:0;">Then the li=
st would force itself as centralized unavoidable intermediary for all commu=
nication between third parties, unless active countermeasures (addressbooks=
or search engines) are used.
rgin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; ">&nb=
sp;
ht:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; -qt-user-state:0;">I strongly =
oppose this solution. It consist in centralization and authoritarism, as w=
ell as breaking mail even more.
--nextPart3026602.0u3x58NJM7--
--===============1839997284==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
_______________________________________________
Hangout mailing list
Hangout-at-nylxs.com
http://lists.mrbrklyn.com/mailman/listinfo/hangout
--===============1839997284==--
