MESSAGE
| DATE | 2019-11-05 |
| FROM | Andreas
|
| SUBJECT | Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Is negative publicity always harmful? (was:
|
From hangout-bounces-at-nylxs.com Tue Nov 5 21:31:53 2019
Return-Path:
X-Original-To: archive-at-mrbrklyn.com
Delivered-To: archive-at-mrbrklyn.com
Received: from www2.mrbrklyn.com (www2.mrbrklyn.com [96.57.23.82])
by mrbrklyn.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1790A163F70;
Tue, 5 Nov 2019 21:31:51 -0500 (EST)
X-Original-To: hangout-at-www2.mrbrklyn.com
Delivered-To: hangout-at-www2.mrbrklyn.com
Received: by mrbrklyn.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 0CF58161134; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 21:29:11 -0500 (EST)
Resent-From: Ruben Safir
Resent-Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2019 21:29:11 -0500
Resent-Message-ID: <20191106022911.GE20969-at-www2.mrbrklyn.com>
Resent-To: hangout-at-mrbrklyn.com
X-Original-To: ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com
Delivered-To: ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com
Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17])
by mrbrklyn.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55E3D161132
for ; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 15:44:11 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost ([::1]:49788 helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
(envelope-from )
id 1iS5gQ-0002x2-TJ
for ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com; Tue, 05 Nov 2019 15:44:10 -0500
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41155)
by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
(envelope-from ) id 1iS4N4-0008Td-LZ
for gnu-misc-discuss-at-gnu.org; Tue, 05 Nov 2019 14:20:07 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
(envelope-from ) id 1iS4N3-0001ly-5s
for gnu-misc-discuss-at-gnu.org; Tue, 05 Nov 2019 14:20:06 -0500
Received: from smtpq6.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net ([212.54.42.169]:46450)
by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from )
id 1iS4N3-0001kc-0J
for gnu-misc-discuss-at-gnu.org; Tue, 05 Nov 2019 14:20:05 -0500
Received: from [212.54.42.135] (helo=smtp11.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net)
by smtpq6.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net with esmtps
(TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1)
(envelope-from ) id 1iS4Mz-0008PS-Uu
for gnu-misc-discuss-at-gnu.org; Tue, 05 Nov 2019 20:20:01 +0100
Received: from g59070.upc-g.chello.nl ([80.57.59.70] helo=debian.local)
by smtp11.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
(envelope-from ) id 1iS4Mz-0001R7-Q0
for gnu-misc-discuss-at-gnu.org; Tue, 05 Nov 2019 20:20:01 +0100
Message-ID: <1572981600.4630.57.camel-at-softwarelibre.nl>
From: Andreas
To: gnu-misc-discuss-at-gnu.org
Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2019 20:20:00 +0100
In-Reply-To:
References: <5ec38bda-be9c-337e-ec18-a3b983a68b73-at-runbox.com>
<87ftj2xkzg.fsf-at-gnu.org>
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.20.5-1
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-SourceIP: 80.57.59.70
X-Ziggo-spambar: /
X-Ziggo-spamscore: 0.0
X-Ziggo-spamreport: CMAE Analysis: v=2.3 cv=GKl27dFK c=1 sm=1 tr=0
a=3rNMXx9fCWX9Nv7qCejn2g==:17 a=jpOVt7BSZ2e4Z31A5e1TngXxSK0=:19
a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=MeAgGD-zjQ4A:10 a=mDV3o1hIAAAA:8 a=PqL2OvapzIUv9k0gQTkA:9
a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=_FVE-zBwftR9WsbkzFJk:22
X-Ziggo-Spam-Status: No
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic]
[fuzzy]
X-Received-From: 212.54.42.169
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 05 Nov 2019 15:44:08 -0500
X-BeenThere: gnu-misc-discuss-at-gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
X-UID: 63593
Subject: Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Is negative publicity always harmful? (was:
Women and GNU and RMS)
X-BeenThere: hangout-at-nylxs.com
List-Id: NYLXS Tech Talk and Politics
List-Unsubscribe: ,
List-Archive:
List-Post:
List-Help:
List-Subscribe: ,
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Errors-To: hangout-bounces-at-nylxs.com
Sender: "Hangout"
On Tue, 2019-11-05 at 13:26 -0500, Thompson, David wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 12:59 PM Brandon Invergo
> wrote:
> > Can we just leave it there?
> =
> I don't think we can.=C2=A0=C2=A0RMS is GNU's leader, and his public comm=
ents,
> whether or not they are specifically about free software, are
> relevant
> to GNU.=C2=A0=C2=A0Some of us are tired of looking the other way.
"Looking the other way" is a spurious allegation, implying a wrong is
being committed that is willfully overlooked and furthermore implying
that those disagreeing or unaware are complicit in the wrong.
Unless such assertions are backed up they remain speculation that
cannot be falsified against or reasoned about, and will continue to
linger and damage GNU.=C2=A0
To avoid that it's best to just leave it, as suggested, or else make a
serious and well-founded claim and illustrate how it impacts GNU and
its functions. I think anything else at this moment in time is simply
detrimental to GNU and any discourse around it.
-Andreas
_______________________________________________
Hangout mailing list
Hangout-at-nylxs.com
http://lists.mrbrklyn.com/mailman/listinfo/hangout
|
|
